Comparison
InjectConsent vs Aesthetic Record
Aesthetic Record is built for practices standardizing an entire med spa on one system, while InjectConsent is built for the two minutes around an injection.
Comparison
Boulevard suits a med spa whose pressure point is booking, flow and the client experience, while InjectConsent suits one whose pressure point is what gets written down in the room.
Boulevard is a client experience platform, and its center of gravity is the calendar, the front desk and the payment. Med spas that compete on booking flow, membership handling and a polished arrival choose it for those reasons, and that is a legitimate way to run an aesthetics business. InjectConsent sits behind the treatment room door instead. It exists so the consent, the lot number, the site map and the before photo are captured in the same two minutes as the injection. Many practices run both, one owning the appointment and the other owning the record a state board would ask to see.
| What you are deciding | InjectConsent | Boulevard |
|---|---|---|
| Center of gravity | The two minutes between the consent signature and the first needle. | The booking, the arrival and the checkout, built as a client experience platform. |
| Who touches it most | The injector, standing at the chair with gloves on. | Front desk and management staff running the day. |
| Consent handling | Versioned consent, signed on the device, locked to that visit and that product. | Approached as part of intake and client flow, so confirm the current setup with them. |
| Lot and traceability | Lot and expiration required per treatment, searchable if a manufacturer notice lands. | Inventory is handled at the business level across a wide service and retail menu. |
| Injection site detail | Units per site on a face map, dilution and technique noted as you inject. | Service records are designed to fit many spa and salon treatment types. |
| Follow up | A fourteen day touch up review opens automatically on filler and tox visits. | Rebooking and outreach are handled through general scheduling and marketing tools. |
| Running both | Fits alongside a booking platform without competing for the calendar. | Comfortable as the system of record for appointments and payments. |
| Best fit | An injector who needs the chart to be complete before the patient stands up. | A multi room spa where flow, memberships and client experience drive revenue. |
The right hand column says what kind of product Boulevard is and who it is built around, not what it charges or ships this quarter. Both keep changing, so check the current shape of each one before you choose. InjectConsent is published by MLJ, SASU and this page is written by Jimenez Julien.
Ask an owner where her week leaks and you get one of two answers. Either the schedule has holes, clients drift and rebooking is manual, or the schedule is full and the charts are three days behind. Those are different problems and they want different tools, which is why comparing a booking platform to a treatment record on a feature grid tells you less than looking at your own Friday afternoon.
If you finish a full day of injecting and still have eleven charts open, no amount of booking polish fixes that. If you finish at three because two clients no showed and nobody rebooked them, a faster chart does not fix that either. Be honest about which day you actually had this week.
Consent signed at reception before the injector has assessed the face is weaker than consent signed at the chair after the plan is discussed. The same is true of the lot number: written from memory at the end of the day, it is a guess, and a guess is worth very little if a patient reports a nodule six months later or a manufacturer issues a notice on a specific batch.
InjectConsent puts capture where the decision happens. You confirm the plan, take the signature, scan or key the lot off the carton in your hand, shoot the three standard frames, and map units as you go. The record is done when the last injection is done, which is the only version of charting that survives a fully booked tox day.
The practical arrangement most injectors land on is simple. The booking platform owns the appointment, the deposit, the reminder and the payment. InjectConsent owns everything from the moment the patient sits in the chair to the fourteen day review. The overlap is the patient name and the appointment time, which is small enough to live with.
What you should not do is split the clinical record itself. Consent in one system and lot numbers in another is the arrangement that fails an inspection, because nobody can produce a single complete visit on request. Pick one place for the treatment record and keep it whole.
No. It does not run a calendar or take payments, so whatever you use for booking stays. The treatment record is the only thing that moves.
Buy booking first if you have no patients yet, because an empty calendar is the immediate problem. Add the treatment record before your first injection day, not after, since the very first chart you write sets the habit for every one that follows.
Yes. The Med Spa tier at $169 a month covers a small team in one room, and the Multi Provider tier at $339 covers several injectors charting under one medical director. Each record carries the name of the injector who wrote it.
Comparison
Aesthetic Record is built for practices standardizing an entire med spa on one system, while InjectConsent is built for the two minutes around an injection.
Comparison
Jotform suits an injector who needs flexible forms she assembles and files herself, while InjectConsent suits one who wants the whole visit captured in one place automatically.
Side by side rows only take you so far, because the difference shows up on a fully booked day rather than in a feature grid. Pick one visit from last week, chart it again here while we walk you through it, and decide which version you would rather hand a state board inspector asking for consent, lot and expiration. Fifteen minutes, and nothing has to move afterward.